Perils of Prohibition

Why we should lower the drinking age to 18

by Elizabeth M. Whelan, Sc.D.

My colleagues at the Harvard School of Public Health, where I studied preventive medicine, deserve high praise for their recent study on teenage drinking. What they found in their survey of college students was that they drink "early and...often," frequently to the point of getting ill.

As a public-health scientist with a daughter, Christine, heading to college this fall, I have professional and personal concerns about teen binge drinking. It is imperative that we explore why so many young people abuse alcohol. From my own study of the effects of alcohol restrictions and my observations of Christine and her friends' predicament about drinking, I believe that today's laws are unrealistic. Prohibiting the sale of liquor to responsible young adults creates an atmosphere where binge drinking and alcohol abuse have become a problem. American teens, unlike their European peers, don't learn how to drink gradually, safely and in moderation.

Alcohol is widely accepted and enjoyed in our culture. Studies show that moderate drinking can be good for you. But we legally proscribe alcohol until the age of 21 (why not 30 or 45?). Christine and her classmates can drive cars, fly planes, marry, vote, pay taxes, take out loans and risk their lives as members of the U.S. armed forces. But laws in all 50 states say that no alcoholic beverages may be sold to anyone until that magic "21" birthday.

In parts of the Western world, moderate drinking by teenagers and even children under their parents' supervision is a given. Though the per capita consumption of alcohol in France, Spain and Portugal is higher than in the United States, the rate of alcoholism and alcohol abuse is lower. A glass of wine at dinner is normal practice. Kids learn to regard moderate drinking as an enjoyable family activity rather than as something they have to sneak away to do . Banning drinking by young people makes it a badge of adulthood-a tantalizing forbidden fruit.

Christine and her teenage friends like to go out with a group to a club, comedy show or sports bar to watch the game. But teens today have to go on the sly with fake IDs and the fear of getting caught. Otherwise, they're denied admittance to most places and left to hang out on the street. That's hardly a safer alternative. Christine and her classmates now find themselves in a legal no man's land. At 18, they're considered adults. Yet when they want to enjoy a drink like other adults, they are, as they put it, "disenfranchised."

Comparing my daughter's dilemma with my own as an "underage" college student, I see a difference--and one that I think has exacerbated the current dilemma. Today's teens are far more sophisticated than we were. They're treated less like children and have more responsibilities than we did. This makes the 21 restriction seem anachronistic.

We should make access to alcohol legal at 18. At the same time, we should come down much harder on alcohol abusers and drunk drivers of all ages. We should intensify our efforts at alcohol education for adolescents. We want them to understand that it is perfectly OK not to drink. But if they do, alcohol should be consumed in moderation.

After all, we choose to teach our children about safe sex, including the benefits of teen abstinence. Why, then, can't we--schools and parents alike--teach them about safe drinking?


Dr. Whelan is President of the American Council on Science and Health, an independent, non-profit consumer-education consortium (

*Adapted from "Perils of Prohibition: Why We Should Lower the Drinking Age to 18" (Newsweek, May 25, 1995, p. 14). Used with permission of the author. All rights reserved. Copyright 1995.


  • Allen, D.N., Sprenken, D.G., and Vitale, P.A. Reactance theory and alcohol consumption laws: Further confirmation among collegiate alcohol consumers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1994, 55(1), 34-40.
  • Asch, P., and Levy, D.T. Does the minimum age effect trafic fatalities? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1987, 6(2), 180-192.
  • Davis, J.E. Alcohol use among college students: Responses to raising the purchase age. Journal of American College Health, 1990, 38, 263.
  • Department of Health and Human Services. Youth and Alcohol: Laws and Enforcement - Is the 21-Year-Old Drinking Age a Myth? Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, 1991.
  • Engs, R.C., and Hanson, D.J. Reactance theory: A test with collegiate drinking. Psychological Reports, 1989, 64, 1083-1086.
  • Engs, R.C., and Hanson, D.J. University students' drinking patterns and problems: Examining the effects of raising the purchase age. Public Health Reports, 1988, 1, 65-83.
  • GAO. Drinking Age Laws: An Evaluation Synopsis of Their Impoat on Highway Safety. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office, 1987.
  • Gonzalez, G. Effect of raising the drinking age among college students in Florida. College Student Journal, 1989, 67-75.
  • Hughes, S.P., and Dodder, R.A. Changing the minimum drinking age: Results from a longitudinal study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1992, 53, 568-575.
  • International Center for Alcohol Policies. Drinking Age Limits. Washington, DC: International Center for Alcohol Policies. 1998 (Report number 4).
  • Viglis, E.,and DeGenova, A. Youth and forbidden fruit: Experiences with changes in legal drinking ages in North America. Journal of Criminal Justice, 1984, 12, 161-172.
  • Williams, F.G., Kirkman-Liff, B.L., and Szivek, P.H. College students drinking behaviors before and after changes in state policy. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 1990, 35, 12-25.