The Prohibition Party of the United States began in 1869. Before the Civil War (1861-1865) temperance groups had promoted voluntary abstinence from alcoholic beverages. The War diverted national attention to more pressing matters. As a result, the temperance movement wayned.

Moral suasion had proved to be both difficult and frustrating. So after the War, temperance groups began calling for the government to prohibit alcohol.

I. Early Years

The Prohibition Party found early success in pressuring towns and counties to enact prohibition laws. Prohibition groups such as the Anti-Saloon League were non-partisan. Therefore, they supported dry (pro-prohibition) candidates in spite of their party. But the Prohibition Party ran candidates on its own ticket.

Yet the Party’s electoral success was modest. Sidney J. Catts, who was blatantly racist and anti-Catholic, became governor of Florida in 1916. That’s the highest office ever achieved by a Prohibition Party candidate.

Beginning in 1914, California voters elected Charles H. Randall to the U.S. House of Representatives. He ran for three successive terms on the Prohibition Party ticket. In his first re-election campaign in 1916, he successfully ran as the candidate of the Party. Also, he ran as the candidate of the Democratic, Republican, and Progressive parties. In so doing, he defeated a candidate running as an independent.

Susanna Salter

Susanna M. Salter, the first woman mayor in the U.S., won on the Prohibition Party ticket. (The only successful Party candidate in the 21st century has been the tax assessor of Thompson Township in Pennsylvania. But he ran unopposed.)

The 18th Amendment (Prohibition) went into effect in 1920. Then the Party pressed for its strict enforcement. But problems created or furthered by National Prohibition grew ever more serious. There were many problems.

• • Burgeoning organized crime.
  • Gangsterism.
  • Political corruption.
  • Bootlegging (even in Congress)
  • Violence.
  • Blindness and deaths from bootleg.
  • Law enforcement corruption.
  • Disrespect for law.
  • Binge drinking.
  • Lower tax revenue.
  • Increased cost of criminal justice.

Popular support for Prohibition collapsed after the mid-1920s and Repeal Groups grew quickly. And by 1932 the platform of the Democratic party contained an anti-Prohibition plank.

Women’s Rights

Throughout its long history, the Prohibition Party has championed women’s equality. For example, at its first convention in 1869, women enjoyed full voting and other delegate rights. Thus, they were the first to have that distinction in any U.S. political party.

The Party platform of 1872 called for women’s voting rights. This was about a half century before that goal was achieved. Also, in its platform of 1892, it called for equal pay for equal work.

Women achieved voting rights nationally in 1920. Promptly, the Party nominated women for office at the national, state, and local levels. Marie Brehm became the first nominee of any party for vice-president.

Decades before the Party existed, Henry Clay said “I’d rather be right than President.” After the Party realized it could never elect a President, it adopted the following song.

I’d rather be right than President, I want my conscience clear.

I’ll firmly stand for the truth and right, I have God to fear.

I’ll work and vote as I pray, no matter what the scoffers say.

I’d rather be right than President, I want my conscious clear.

II. Later Years

Following Repeal in 1933, the Prohibition Party began its long decline. It has run a candidate for the presidency of the U.S. in every election since 1872. But the number of votes its candidates have received have dropped greatly. For example, the votes for its major candidates were 270,770 in 1892. After Repeal, they were down to 103,489 in 1948. They dropped to 23,266 in 1964, and 4,597 in 2020. And it was as low as 140 in 2004.

The Party briefly changed its name to the National Statesman Party in 1977. (It changed it back in 1980.) But the name change didn’t impress Time magazine. It wrote it “‘doubtful’ that the name change would ‘hoist the party out of the category of a political oddity.'”

The declining fortunes of the Prohibition Party are obvious in the venues of its conventions. In the early years they were in impressive, large places.  They included the opera house in Columbus (OH), the Exposition Hall in Pittsburgh, and the First Regiment Armory in Chicago. In later years, the locations have been much more modest. They included a motel in Birmingham (AL) and in a private living room in Lakewood (CO). Now the Party doesn’t hold conventions. Instead, it uses conference calls to select candidates.

III. Internal Conflict

The Prohibition National Committee (PNC) is the governing body of the Prohibition Party. A faction of that body operated what it claimed was the official web site of the PNC at prohibition.org. That website no longer exists.

A majority group operates another site (prohibitionists.org). It asserts that it represents the Prohibition National Committee. In making its claim, the majority group stated the following.

All actions of the private, invitational meeting of selected Prohibition National Committee members, held last June, held at Lakewood, Colorado, were declared null and void by an absolute majority of PNC members, meeting at Fairfield Glade, Tennessee on 5-6 September 2003. 

It wrote an alleged “2003 nominating convention” of the Prohibition Party was held at the Chairman’s home in Lakewood, Colorado on June 12-13, 2003. Some members of the National Committee were not notified in advance that the meeting was being held. Others were told by Chairman Earl F. Dodge that they would not be admitted. Eight people were present: Chairman Dodge, his two daughters, and five other members supportive of Dodge. In addition to failing to observe the By-Laws requirement for prior notification, there was not a quorum.

Members alleged that Dodge had misused Party funds, kept secrets from party members, and stole property from party members. These and other problems led to the party split.

In the 2004 election, the majority faction ran Gene Amondson as its presidential candidate. But Earl Dodge died in 2007. So Amondson was the sole Prohibition Party candidate for that office in 2008. Currently, the Party is not split.

IV. Future Uncertain

With the death of Amondson in 2009, the future of the Prohibition Party remains uncertain. But the Party has continued to nominate candidates for President and Vice-President.

Also, other components of the Prohibition Party organizational structure continue. They are these.

• • Prohibition National Committee.
  • National Prohibition Foundation.
  • Partisan Prohibition Historical Society.
  • Action! Prohibitionists’ caucus.
  • All state and local chapters.

In spite of the clear failure of Prohibition, many people and groups today support neo-prohibition ideas. Indeed, almost one in five adults currently supports prohibiting the consumption of alcohol. By anyone of any age. Or for any purpose.Not even National Prohibition outlawed drinking alcohol.

V. Prohibition Party Historic Election Results

VI. Resources: Prohibition Party