Strict Alcohol Laws: Easier to Buy a Shotgun than a Keg: NC

An 18 year old can buy a shotgun or other long rifle in North Carolina without a permit. But no one of any age can buy a keg of beer without a permit. Thus, it’s easier to buy a shotgun than a keg of beer! NC has very strict alcohol laws.

State law permits police to demand alcohol tests of pedestrians under the age of 21. A similar law in Michigan was overturned as unconstitutional.

strict alcohol lawsState law also permits the use in court of less reliable field alcohol breath testers. That’s instead of those at police stations. The former are more likely to be accurate.

State law permits police to intrude onto private property to arrest suspected impaired drivers. The private property includes farms, ranches, forests, and other private lands.

Police in the state can obtain private medical records of anyone involved in a traffic crash. They can do so even if those involved are innocent sober victims.

Religious Freedom Violated

It’s also illegal for anyone under the age of 21 to consume alcohol for any reason. That includes religious and medicinal purposes.

strict alcohol lawsThose under the age of 21 who seek medical care for alcohol poisoning. They can be charged with the crime of drinking alcohol. An unintended result of such laws is that fewer people seek needed medical help. As a result, they needlessly die.

Thus, many states have enacted alcohol amnesty laws. These states value the lives of their young people higher than rigid law enforcement. For example, see the Alcohol Emergency Immunity (Good Samaritan Law).

State law law also greatly limits the ability of defendants to challenge evidence against them. Especially that which is either inaccurate or illegally obtained. Of course, that encourages police illegal actions against the public.

Origin of These Strict Alcohol Laws

These laws were all enacted under a governor (Mike Easley) who was a former prosecutor. He chose everyone on the commission that proposed these stringent laws. All members were either in law enforcement or worked for the state as prosecutors.

There was not a single member to advocate for the legal rights of citizens. So it was a stacked deck against the public. And against personal rights.

Reducing impaired driving is very important. But it shouldn’t be at the expense of the rights of citizens. That would be a police state.

Strict Alcohol Laws